Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows: Part : $125 Million
Even people who werent Harry Potter fans felt they should check out the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 just to see what all the hype was about. The excitement for the final movie in the series was extremely high back in the summer of 2011 and, inevitably, it was a roaring success raking in $1,341,932,398 across the globe.
That was enough to make it the biggest movie of the year ahead of Transformers: Dark of the Moon and Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides. Its an extremely emotional affair so, if youve yet to watch it, we recommend getting the tissues at the ready.
You May Like: Is Harry Potter And The Cursed Child Movie
What Is The Hardest Harry Potter Book To Read
Readers caught up to the books difficulty. The hardest of the books to read is the fourth: Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. This book is at a reading level of 9.2, and in it, Harry is in the equivalent to 9th grade.
What is the 2nd longest Harry Potter movie? The longest Harry Potter movies
- The Chamber of Secrets 2 hours and 41 minutes
- The Goblet of Fire 2 hours and 37 minutes
- The Half-Blood Prince 2 hours and 33 minutes
- The Philisophers Stone 2 hours and 32 minutes
How old was Harry Potter in the first movie?
Daniel Radcliffe as Harry Potter: An 11-year-old orphan raised by his unwelcoming aunt and uncle, who learns of his own fame as a wizard known to have survived his parents murder at the hands of the dark wizard Lord Voldemort as an infant when he is accepted to Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry.
How long is 3rd Harry Potter movie? Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
|Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban|
How To Watch Harry Potter Movies In Order
Everyone came into the Wizarding World through the Harry Potter books and movies, which introduced us to a gifted 11-year-old, his friends Ron and Hermione, and their hallowed school of magic, Hogwarts. Watching the Harry Potter movies in order, seeing the story unfold chronologically in-universe, used to be as easy as finding the one where Daniel Radcliffe looks youngest and starting from there.
But the series has expanded now with the Fantastic Beasts movies, set some 70 years before The Sorcerers Stone. So to watch the Harry Potter movies in order, your journey now begins with Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them, set in 1926 and starring Eddie Redmayne as Newt Scarmander. Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald is set in 1927. The third Fantastic Beasts intends to release July 2022, with two more movies to close out the Scarmander and Grindelwald saga.
Then the story of Harry himself begins, starting with Sorcerers Stone and concluding in the second-part of The Deathly Hallows, for eight Certified Fresh movies in a row. Theres also a Harry Potter series early in development for HBO Max. For now, see our guide below on how to watch all Harry Potter movies in order.
Read Also: Harry Potter Vans Release
Harry Potter And The Goblet Of Fire
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire was the movie that showed that death was possible in the one-time children’s movie series. In this film, Harry took part in a tri-wizarding tournament that saw him battle in a series of tests to determine the school with the best young wizard.
However, that was just to move the plot along as the true importance of this movie, directed by Mike Newell, was to bring Lord Voldemort back from the dead, setting up the main villain for the rest of the series. Robert Pattinson of Twilight fame was a Hogwarts student in this movie, killed in cold blood by the Death Eaters, and Voldemort declared war on all wizards by the end of this film.
International Box Office: Grindelwald Has Quarter Billion Dollar Global Debut
Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald started its international run with $191.5 million on 50,865 screens in 79 markets for a worldwide debut of $253.7 million. Its largest opening was in China, but it had to settle for second place there with $36.68 million on 22,008 screens over the weekend for a total opening of $37.53 million. It had more impressive debuts in the U.K. and in Russia . The film had the best opening in the Harry Potter franchise in 21 markets, but overall, it was only 3% ahead of Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them in the same markets. Its much weaker reviews will likely lead to shorter legs, but even so, it should still have no problem getting to $600 million worldwide and becoming Warner Bros. biggest hit of the year. If the next installment in the franchise falls just as much, then the studio will have reason to be concerned. More…
Recommended Reading: Who Did Neville Marry
Where To Watch The Harry Potter Movies
Due to various rights issues, the two streamers have traded the Harry Potter movie collection between them. Now, they appear to be sharing for at least a period of time.
The two Fantastic Beasts films Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them and Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald are not on any streaming service. You will need to rent or purchase them from a digital retailer.
Thursday Night Previews: Grindelwalds Previews Were Fantastic And Beastly
Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald earned $9.1 million during previews on Thursday, which is better than Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them managed. Granted, it was better by mere percentage points, as that earlier film earned $8.75 million during its previews. Where it goes from here is a bit of a mystery. On the one hand, its reviews are much worse than the previous installments reviews were and it is a sequel. Both of those facts suggest shorter legs. However, the gap between Fantastic Beasts and the last original Harry Potter film may have resulted in a much more front-loaded run, so The Crimes of Grindelwald could benefit from that. As always, we will know better this time tomorrow when Friday estimates are out. More…
Don’t Miss: Harry Potter Emoji
Are The Harry Potter Movies On Peacock Or Hbo Max
Wait, didn’t Peacock have the Harry Potter movies? Or was it HBO Max? Yes, they have swapped ownership of the franchise since they both launched. Currently , both services are streaming all Harry Potter movies.
HBO Max streamed the Harry Potter movies when it launched in summer 2020. See, WarnerMedia owns the Harry Potter film franchise. However, the corporation sold the broadcast and cable rights to NBCUniversal, which owns Peacock. But WarnerMedia borrowed them back likely for a hefty fee so that its new streaming service could launch with some big titles.
Then, the Harry Potter movies moved back to Peacock, where they streamed on and off through 2021. They returned to HBO Max over the summer. In October, both streamers have them.
And then who knows what will happen in 2025, when NBCUniversal’s TV rights lapse.
As writer Jess Mason joked on , “Harry Potter is like the child of a divorce where the parents are Universal and Warner Bros and the franchise just keeps being pulled to different homes.”
So many streaming services, all fighting over the same valuable IP.
- Read next: The best Netflix movies to watch right now
All 8 Harry Potter Movies Ranked Worst To Best
Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint, David Thewlis, Gary Oldman, Maggie Smith, Michael … Gambon, Alan Rickman, Jim Broadbent and Ralph Fiennes
In what seems to be an endless game of hot potato, the Harry Potter films have now, again, jumped ship from Peacock to HBO Max. The definitive tentpole fantasy franchise of the 2000s, which began with a record $93 million opening weekend and $974 million global gross in November 2001 and ended with a record $169 million opening weekend and $1.34 billion global cume in July of 2011 essentially has two homes.
The films obviously belong to Warner Bros., but the theme park attractions belongs to Universal Studios. Anyway, to mark the occasion, and since Ive never sat and done this before, I have used science, math and dark magic to create the the official, 104% accurate ranking of all eight Harry Potter movies. I like all of these films to various degrees, but, as always, this list will not be your list, because what fun would that be?
Producer David Heyman and director Chris Columbus with co-stars Emma Watson, Daniel Radcliffe and … Rupert Grint attending the N.Y. Premiere of Warner Bros. “Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets” at the Ziegfeld Theatre in New York City. November 10, 200
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets
Budget: $100 million
Worldwide box office: $878.75 million
Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince
Budget: $250. million
Opening weekend: $77.84 million
Don’t Miss: What’s In Wideye Potion
Charlie And The Chocolate Factory Introduces Us To Willy Wonka And His Quest To Find A Suitable Heir
In the film Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, selected children are granted permission to enter the chocolate factory of chocolatier Willy Wonka after finding a coveted golden ticket. During the tour, however, they quickly discover that more adventure awaits as Willy intends to select the heir to his confection business through the tour. The film stars Johnny Depp as the eccentric Willy Wonka. He is also joined by Helena Bonham Carter, Christopher Lee, and David Kelly.
You May Like:
Casting The Roles Of Harry Ron And Hermione
In 2000, after a seven-month search, lead actor Daniel Radcliffe was discovered by producer David Heyman and writer Steve Kloves seated just behind them in a theatre. In Heyman’s own words, “There sitting behind me was this boy with these big blue eyes. It was Dan Radcliffe. I remember my first impressions: He was curious and funny and so energetic. There was real generosity too, and sweetness. But at the same time he was really voracious and with hunger for knowledge of whatever kind.”
Radcliffe had already established himself as an actor in the 1999 BBC television production of David Copperfield in which he played the title role’s childhood years. Heyman persuaded Radcliffe’s parents to allow him to audition for the part of Harry Potter, which involved Radcliffe being filmed. Rowling was enthusiastic after viewing Radcliffe’s filmed test, saying she didn’t think there was a better choice for the part of Harry Potter.
Also in 2000, the then unknown British actors Emma Watson and Rupert Grint were selected from thousands of auditioning children to play the roles of Hermione Granger and Ron Weasley, respectively. Their only previous acting experience was in school plays. Grint was eleven years old and Watson ten at the time they were cast.
Don’t Miss: Who Did Harry Potter Marry
All The Harry Potter Movies In Order
How do you watch the Harry Potter movies in order? Between all the broomsticks, butterbeer, and explosive spells, theres no denying the Harry Potter franchise holds a special place in many fantasy movie lovers hearts. In fact, the famous story of The Boy Who Lived and all the colourful Harry Potter characters in the dangerous Wizarding World is considered by many to be timeless. However, with ten films in total, and more on the way, it can be tricky figuring out where to start.
Unlike other franchises, Harry Potters titles arent numbered, so wizarding newbies can find themselves incredibly confused. All of the Harry Potter movies are sequential, meaning that if you dont watch them in the right order, youll most likely be trying to piece together the plot yourself, scratching your head in confusion instead of enjoying movie night.
Keeping that in mind, weve made a spoiler-free guide to establish whats the best order to watch the movies in and why. Looking at all eight Harry Potter films and the spin-offs, here is the list of movies, in the order which tells the magical story the best as of right now.
How do I watch the Harry Potter movies in order?
Harry Potter And The Order Of The Phoenix: $150million
Also made on a budget of $150m was The Order of the Phoenix. Its the movie that introduces the repulsive Dolores Umbridge, sees Sirius Black tragically pass away, and also shows Harry extremely vulnerable as Lord Voldemort looks to isolate him and take control of the wizarding world while operating in the shadows.
The movie made more money than its predecessor, taking home $943,076,457 as opposed to the Goblet of Fires $897,099,794. However, it wasnt the most successful movie of 2007 with Pirates of the Caribbean: At Worlds End triumphing in the box office battle instead.
You May Like: Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows Part 1 Running Time
Weekend Estimates: Batman V Superman Hits March Record $170 Milion
Batman and Superman not only had to fight each other this weekend, but also mediocre reviews. They have come through in some style, however, posting a record for March of $170.1 million, according to Warner Bros. Sunday morning estimate. Our model has the film coming a little below that mark, at $165 million or so, which might mean it wont quite top Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part IIs $169 million, which is currently the studios best ever weekend. But the fact that were comparing the movie to the Harry Potter franchise is nothing but good news for them.More…
Are Harry Potter Books Better Than Movies
Among the most significant benefits, the Harry Potter books have over the films is the total amount of time that they have with the viewers. J.K. Rowling had time to inform Harrys epic-scale narrative, which allowed her to flesh out the Wizarding World and the numerous characters that live in her tales.
Also Check: Who’s My Harry Potter Soulmate
How Long Would All The Harry Potter Movies Be
|Deathly Hallows part 2||130 Minutes|
There are so many variables, but one can take a stab at it. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part one is 146 minutes according to Wikipedia. So on an average length film will play for two and a half hours.
Then one must add on each time for the opening and closing credits, which if multiplied, comes out to around 50-70 minutes in total. This adds up to about 4 hours 27 minutes. Depending on how many trailers were attached to each movie, that could extend it another hour, but not every trailer was identical in the length of time either.
Also, start with the length of all seven Harry Potter books and then divide them by the number of movies in the series. The first book is 230 pages long, so each movie will be roughly 51 pages long.
If someone were to watch the whole , it would take a run time of 1178 minutes. That being said, it is worth taking two days to completely tackle all the seasons because everyone does need to fall asleep. For instance, if a person begins watching the marathon at 9:30 pm on 1st January, they will finish watching at 6:25 pm on 2nd January.
How Long Does It Take To Play All The Harry Potter Movies
Over 20 hours. Correct! If you play the Harry Potter movies without stopping, it takes 19 hours and 39 minutes. However, factoring in breaks, the time it takes to change the movies, and any technical difficulties you might have, a full Harry Potter Marathon will take over 20 hours! Read on for another quiz question. Days. Not quite!
The Best Harry Potter Movies Ranked From Worst To Wand
ByLouise Blain12 December 2018
Find out where The Crimes of Grindelwald falls on our ranked list of the best Harry Potter movies
Trying to decide what are the best Harry Potter movies is such a dangerous endeavour that one can only liken it to an unaccompanied trip into the Forbidden Forest. The good news is that were going to follow the spiders together, which might make it a little less terrifying, but please keep your wand at the ready. Theres a simple reason why trying to rank the best Harry Potter movies is like a particularly fiendish O.W.L. Its easy to forget but due to how long it took to finish the series in film form, multiple generations of wizards literally grew up with these movies. Throw in the latest two Fantastic Beasts entries and these are formative film memories were playing with here, a magic that even Dumbledore himself would surely warn us against trying to fully understand.
You May Like: Whats The 3rd Harry Potter Movie
Analysis: Sandra Bullock Is Hollywoods Top Actress
With the recent weak performance of films such as Transcendence and Edge of Tomorrow at the box office, theres been a lot of talk recently about how much actors and actresses are really worth to a film. The poor performance of these films hasnt come as a huge surprise to followers of the Bankability Index, which produces valuations considerably below the $20 million that Johnny Depp reportedly earned from his lead role in Transcendence, and we thought this is a good opportunity to look at what the Index says about the most valuable actors and actresses in the business.
With Angelina Jolie making headlines for all the right reasons for her starring role in Maleficent, it seemed only fitting to start with an analysis of the most valuable actresses in Hollywood. For this chart, weve taken each stars worldwide Bankability Index and divided it by the number of films they make each year to get an estimate of the average value they bring to a film, as of June, 2014.More
Read Also: Were Grindelwald And Dumbledore Lovers