What Happened To Ariana Dumbledore
Dumbledore’s younger sister was abused by a bunch of muggle kids when she was just six years old. The ordeal caused her to become emotionally and magically unstable. Albus’ father took vengeance on the kids who hurt Ariana, landing him in Azkaban. Albus’ mother Kendra kept Ariana at home, out of view from the magical community, sparking rumors that she was a squib, and that Kendra was ashamed of her. In Deathly Hallows, Dumbledore explains to Harry that the real reason Ariana was kept hidden was because they feared she’d be seen as a threat to the International Statute of Secrecy and shipped off to St. Mungo’s.
So, Ariana was kept hidden away, and at fourteen, one of her outbursts resulted in her mother’s death. This, according to both Albus and Aberforth Dumbledore, though neither of them were there at the time. Dumbledore’s issues with the International Statute of Secrecy stemmed from the tragedy surrounding his sister. And that proved to be a binding ingredient in the friendship he quickly formed with Grindelwald not long after his mother died. Grindelwald wanted to live in a world where wizards were dominant over muggles. Dumbledore wanted to live in a world where his sister didn’t have to live in hiding. And probably a world where she wouldn’t have been abused by those muggles in the first place.
And that age situation is the only real hole in this theory…
How Did Dumbledore Find Fawkes
One of the most recognizable aspects of Dumbledore’s office was the presence of Fawkes the phoenix. It was revealed in the Crimes of Grindelwald that a phoenix will come to any Dumbledore in need. So, perhaps Fawkes came to Dumbledore when he needed him most. This has happened before as, during the duel between Voldemort and Dumbledore at the Ministry of Magic, Fawkes helped Dumbledore by blocking some of Voldemort’s curses.
While no one currently knows how Dumbledore came to find Fawkes and gain his trust, it is expected that we will find the answer to this question in one of the remaining Fantastic Beasts movies.
Dumbledore Lied To Harry About His Heart’s Desire
Dumbledore typically chose to withhold the truth from Harry over outright lying to his favorite student, but when Harry asked Albus what he saw in the Mirror of Erised, Dumbledore gave him a completely dishonest answer.
He claimed that he saw himself holding a pair of socks, when in reality he likely saw himself with former flame Gellert Grindelwald. There really wasn’t any reason for Dumbledore to hide this side of himself from Harry.
Don’t Miss: How To Put Clasp On Harry Potter Robe
Dumbledore Was Rarely There For Harry When He Was Needed
Some fans try to defend Dumbledore by saying that he always did what he could to keep Harry safe. Sure, he sent Fawkes and Dobby to Harry in moments of danger, but the only time he actually showed up in person to assist the teenager was the Ministry of Magic showdown against Voldemort in;Order of the Phoenix.
When Harry found himself facing Professor Quirrell, Barty Crouch Jr., a basilisk, a dragon and a cemetery full of Death Eaters, his headmaster was nowhere to be found.
Albus Didn’t Do Anything To Stop Harry And Snape’s Rivalry
For years, Harry had a rivalry with Severus Snape. Harry was suspicious of the Potions professor’s true allegiance, and Snape blamed Harry for Lily’s death. Dumbledore knew both sides of this feud, but did nothing to help Harry and Snape get over their issues with each other.
If Snape didn’t give Harry some of his memories in his final moments, Harry never would have known about;Snape and Lily’s connection;or Snape’s years of trying to honor Lily by protecting Harry behind the scenes. Dumbledore’s secrecy kept Harry;from appreciating;Severus until he was already gone.
Read Also: Who Plays Lord Voldemort In Harry Potter
Albus Could Have Just Adopted Harry
When Albus initially left baby Harry in the Dursley’s care, he might have thought that parenthood would change Vernon and Petunia’s personalities. It didn’t, of course, and they were absolutely horrible to Harry throughout his entire childhood.
Dumbledore could have, at any point, taken Harry away from his abusive aunt and uncle and simply adopted him. He could have protected Harry himself, and taught him powerful magic that’d ensure Harry would be better suited to take care of himself as well.
Albus Used Harry To Manipulate Slughorn
Dumbledore and Harry didnât really spend all that much time together. On the few occasions that they did actually socialize, it was often for a particular purpose and not just because Albus enjoyed Harryâs company.
Dumbledore needed Horace Slughorn to return to Hogwarts so he could procure his knowledge about Voldemortâs Horcruxes, so he used Harry to manipulate the old Potions professor.;He brought Harry to Slughornâs home during his hiring pitch,;and;used Slughornâs love for âcollectingâ influential people in his Slug Club and his old fondness for Lily Potter to convince Horace to teach again.
Don’t Miss: Draco Malfoy Birthday
How Did Dumbledore Destroy The Ring
DumbledoreDumbledoredestroydid destroy theringdid
. Simply so, why did Dumbledore put on the ring?
Dumbledore did indeed use the stone incorrectly.In his excitement to recall his lost family, he let himself forgetthat the ring was a Horcrux and he simply put thering on. After Dumbledore recovered the ring,he destroyed the Horcrux with the Sword of Gryffindor, which is tosay he specifically destroyed the ring.
One may also ask, what movie did Dumbledore put on the ring? Now, Dumbledore put on Marvolo’s ring,knowing that it was the Resurrection Stone which was on thering.
Also to know is, how did Dumbledore get the Resurrection Stone?
After using Godric Gryffindor’s Sword to destroy theHorcrux within the ring, Dumbledore sealed the Stonewithin the very first Golden Snitch Harry Potter had ever caughtand made arrangements to have Harry inherit the Stone in hiswill.
Who gave Dumbledore the ring?
This enacted the ring’s deadly curse, and itbegan to quickly spread through Dumbledore’s body, startingwith the hand on which he had put the ring. AfterDumbledore returned to Hogwarts, he used Godric Griffindor’sSword to crack the Resurrection Stone so as to destroy it as aHorcrux.
Nitwit Blubber Oddment Tweek
Considering the fact that the;ring;was in plain sight up until Chapter Ten, but after that time is never seen again, it is most plausible that the destruction of the;Horcrux;took place sometime between the;ring;being set on the spindle-legged table and its noted absence. Unsurprisingly, this is not;Harrys assumption.
Harry;is used to the enigmatic words of;Albus Dumbledore, and seems to accept the authority of their assumed meanings and connections with very little question. Back in his first year, there was never any explanation of how the Sorcerers Stone was destroyed and;Harry;never even requested one.
If the;rings absence is indicative of the;Horcruxs destruction, then we clearly did witness the blackened hand before seeing the;ring;in its destroyed state. Therefore, the destruction of the;ring/Horcrux, the crack in the stone, and the burning of;Dumbledores hand are not concurrent, but three separate matters of erroneous coincidence: a red herring for;Harry;and the reader, supported largely by the loose inferences of a very secretive and always enigmatic;Dumbledore.
Considerably later in the book,;in the chapter entitled Horcruxes,;Dumbledore;enables;Harrys already imagined story to take on just a bit more form. Again,;Dumbledore;never actually explains in any clear or convincing manner the actual story behind his tragically injured hand.
Also Check: When Was The First Harry Potter Movie
How Does The Timeline Work Now
The Crimes of Grindelwald doesnt just introduce new faces to the Potter world it brings back some old friends in young forms that dont really make a ton of sense.
Chief among those is the appearance by a young Professor McGonagall, whose brief scenes in Crimes of Grindelwald dont fit the franchises established timeline. McGonagalls birthday had previously been worked out by fans at the Harry Potter wiki to be in 1935, eight years after Crimes takes place. McGonagall herself notes in Order of the Phoenix that she had only been teaching at Hogwarts for thirty-nine years this December in 1995, putting her start date in 1956. And yet Crimes has her as an adult, already teaching at the school in 1927. The obvious answer is that the Professor McGonagall in the film is an older relative again, Rowling loves to bring in recognizable names from different generations except that the films credits and Rowlings official script both indicate that the character in the film is Minerva McGonagall. Thats confusing, but its unlikely to be a mistake its more likely that Rowling is changing the timeline somehow.
What Did Dumbledore Say To Snape Before He Died
Severus please These were the last words Dumbledore said to Snape before he used the Avada Kedavra curse and killed the Headmaster of Hogwarts.
In the beginning, we thought the phrase meant, Please, Severus, help me! but the truth was different. The ending of book seven Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows revealed that Dumbledore was dying and that he had arranged that Snape would administer the final kill.
Finally, when the time came for Snape to actually kill Dumbledore he hesitated, regardless of their previous agreement, so Dumbledore had to beg Severus to end his life.
So, the real meaning of the phrase was: Severus, please kill me right now.
You May Like: Longest Harry Potter Book
Why Dumbledores Reaction Was Changed In Goblet Of Fire
After Harrys name comes out from the Goblet of Fire, everyone at Hogwarts begins to wonder how was it possible for his name to be added if he was too young and there was an Age Line protecting the Goblet and keeping those younger than 17 away. In the book, Dumbledore approaches Harry and asks calmly if he put his name into the Goblet of Fire in the movie, however, his reaction is the complete opposite. Dumbledore runs to Harry and reacts rather intensely, desperately asking him if he put his name in the Goblet .
A reason for this change hasnt been revealed, so it was most likely a creative decision of the director and/or Michael Gambon when building the character and to add more drama to the scene. Dumbledores intensity is a frequent topic of discussion between Harry Potter fans as it felt out of character, as Dumbledore from the books would have never reacted so aggressively towards Harry. The scene as described in the book implies Dumbledore knew it couldnt have been Harry, which is why he asks calmly, as it was a mere formality in the movie, Dumbledores reaction shows he believes Harry could have definitely done it.
Did Antioch Peverell Create The Elder Wand
Its unclear who created the Elder wand and the rest of the Deathly Hallows. For now, we only have Death and the Peverells themselves. Weve heard the tale of the three brothers concerning Death.
But what about the other version? How were the Peverell brothers able to create such powerful magical artifacts? There are arguments to support just how they were able to make the Deathly Hallows.
Before we begin with the Elder wand, we first need to know a bit more about wandlore. This way, we can know just how difficult and nearly impossible it can be to create the Deathly Hallows.
Wands in the world of Harry Potter generally have two parts; a magical core and a type of wood to surround it. There are different types of wand wood that a wandmaker can use to create a wand.
Each type of wood from Acacia to Yew have their own unique characteristics. It is also important to note that not all trees can be used to create wands. In fact, only few trees are gifted and only those with years of experience can tell which are mundane and which are not.
The gifted trees are as few as the humans that can conjure magic. The rarest wands are those made from the Elder tree. This is because of a popular belief that wands made from Elder cause misfortune. A wand that has been created with Elder wood does not know loyalty, as it is said.
Recommended Reading: How Did Dumbledore Get The Ring
Well You Cant Break An Unbreakable Vow
So what do we know about;Unbreakable Vows? Ron tells;Harry;what little he knows of them.
Well, you cant break an Unbreakable Vow . . .
Id worked that much out for myself, funnily enough. What happens if you break it, then?
You die. Said Ron simply. Fred and George tried to get me to make one when I was about five. I nearly did too, I was holding hands with Fred and everything when Dad found us. He went mental, said Ron with a reminiscent gleam in his eyes.
Based on;Mr. and Mrs. Weasleys reaction to their children even playing at such a thing, one has to assume that no matter the intent the consequences are believed to be very real, very dire, and most-likely as intractable as an;Unforgivable Curse. Messing around with;Unbreakable Vows;is simply not done and not tolerated, much as a child handling a loaded gun would be regarded within Muggle circles.
Earlier, at the start-of-term feast, when others first notice;Dumbledores blackened and dead-looking hand,;Hermione;gives;Harry;an explanation about why;Madame Pomfrey;may not have been able to cure it. It looks as if its died, said Hermione, with a nauseated expression. But there are some injuries you cant cure . . . old curses . . . and there are poisons without antidotes . . . ;Hermiones use of the word died is an undeniably prophetic clue to the truth.
When;Harry;tells;Dumbledore;that he overheard;Snape;telling;Malfoy;that he had made the;Unbreakable Vow,;Dumbledores response is truly unexpected.
What Happened To The Actor That Played Professor Dumbledor
Bagshot happened to be neighbors with the Dumbledore family. Albus Dumbledore and Gellert Grindelwald both ambitious, and may end in a Dumbledore-Grindelwald showdown. In the first movie, So you want someone who is charismatic, who is brave as an actor, who can stand up and is iconic. Johnny . Cedric Diggory is portrayed by an unknown actor in the film adaptation of Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban. Cedric’s death is the first death Harry witnesses in the book series. Harry was in his cot when his mother died, but he would not remember due to his age at the time, and he passed out before he sees Quirrell die First, the biggest revelation of the night came when Jo revealed to her audience the fact that Albus Dumbledore is gay and had fallen in love with fellow wizard and friend, Gellert Grindelwald An actor would tell a crew member and the crew member would grab the boy and hold him for the actor and then often the crew member would take a turn too. The former actor said some of the tween girls on the set were bothered, but as far as he knows, none were raped liked the boys
Read Also: Harry Potter Prime
Harry Potter And The Order Of The Phoenix
In the fifth book, Dumbledore is demoted from Chief Warlock of the Wizengamot, voted out of the Chairmanship of the International Confederation of Wizards, and is almost stripped of his Order of Merlin First Class due to his speeches regarding the return of Voldemort, although it is reported that he is unconcerned as long as he is not taken off the Chocolate Frog cards. Meanwhile, the Ministry of Magic does everything they can to discredit him and Harry mainly through the Daily Prophet. At the beginning of the book, Dumbledore enrages Fudge when he stops by at Harry’s hearing with a witness to ensure that he is not expelled. While Harry feels better when Dumbledore assists him, he becomes annoyed to the point of being angry that the headmaster refuses to speak to or even look at him.
Dumbledore And The Resurrection Stone Secrets Revealed
In Books
The story of Dumbledore and the Resurrection Stone was cloaked in secrecy in;Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince. How did Dumbledore get the Resurrection Stone? And what happened to his hand? By reading between the lines, you can discover the real tragedy behind Dumbledore and the Resurrection Stone.
Disclosure: Some of the links in this blog post are affiliate links. Media Medusa earns a small commission, at no extra cost to you, when you buy something through these links.
Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince isnt my favorite book in the Harry Potter series for a number of reasons. The first reason is that it begins with a somewhat tedious chapter thats meant to catch up the folks who havent been reading the preceding books religiously, and to set up the events to come. A conversation between the Prime Minister and former Minister of Magic, Cornelius Fudge, just isnt terribly engrossing.
If you want to read the article later, download it in .PDF and read it whenever you wish. .
Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince back cover / CR: Kazu Kibuishi / Scholastic
You May Like: Harry Potter Vans Release Date Us
From Tongue Of Flame To Hand Of Char
In chapter two, Spinners End,;Snape;surprises;Bellatrix;by agreeing to make the;Unbreakable Vow;with;Narcissa;. With;Bellatrix;as witness, along with the obviously spying;Wormtail;just out of view, we watch as they clasp their right hands together and see flames shoot from a wand binding their hands and their words in a most vivid and unusual manner.
Bellatrixs astounded face glowed red in the blaze of a third tongue of flame, which shot from the wand, twisted with the others, and bound itself thickly around their clasped hands, like a rope, like a fiery snake.
The chapter ends on that rather ominous note, setting us up for;Draco;and;Snapes later actions. But positioned as it is in within the book, could it actually be setting us up for a more immediate scene?
When we finally catch up with;Harry;for the first time, it occurs in the very next chapter. He is at;Privet Drive, awaiting the arrival of Professor;Dumbledore. And what is the first thing;Harry;observes about;Dumbledores appearance? As he replaced his wand in his pocket,;Harry;saw that his hand was blackened and shriveled; it looked as though his flesh had been burned away.
The evidence is very strong that it was not;Snape;who made the;Unbreakable Vow, but;Dumbledore. It was not;Snapes hand engulfed in flames, but;Dumbledores! This seems the only visibly obvious explanation for;Dumbledores blackened hand.